Quantum Computing: Progress, Challenges, and the Path Forward for Deep Tech Businesses

Quantum computing is accelerating, yet it remains a challenge for businesses working on the cutting edge (Gill et al., 2024). While quantum promises breakthroughs in areas like cryptography, optimization, and AI, most industries are still grappling with the reality of operating ahead of mass adoption. Deep tech companies are tasked with navigating not just the complexity of quantum technology but also the economic and strategic challenges of being late to the game. As someone who has worked on quantum software and mathematical optimization, I’ve seen how this cutting-edge technology is already bleeding into areas like operations research and pushing the limits of classical computing (Cattelan & Yarkoni, 2024).

In this blog, I’ll provide a technical review of quantum technologies, tools, and their applications, but I’ll also discuss the hard truths that deep tech businesses face today. With new processing units emerging from Japan, North America, and Europe, the quantum landscape is more dynamic than ever—and staying ahead of the curve is no small feat.

Quantum Computing – Progress Made, Challenges Ahead

Quantum computing has made significant strides over the last decade. We're currently in an era of imperfect but promising quantum systems (noisy intermediate-scale quantum, or NISQ), where these advanced computers are powerful yet prone to errors, and still rely on traditional computers for most complex calculations. Companies like IBM (Bravyi et al., 2024), Google (Acharya et al., 2024), and emerging startups (Dimitrov et al., 2023) are competing to build the first truly scalable quantum computer, and every year we see new advancements in qubit stability, error correction, and processing power.

But here’s the challenge: while the technology is progressing, businesses investing in quantum today face the reality that widespread adoption and the economies of scale are still years away. This has forced companies to strategize—how do you justify investing in quantum R&D when the returns aren’t immediate? How do you balance being on the bleeding edge of technology while ensuring it integrates with existing systems?

The answer is that quantum isn’t just about the future — it’s about pushing the boundaries of what’s possible today, particularly in fields like mathematical optimization and operations research.

Quantum’s Impact on Mathematical Optimization and Operations Research

In my experience working with optimization problems, I’ve seen how quantum algorithms are already shaking up traditional methods. Fields like operations research, which relies heavily on linear programming, combinatorial optimization, and simulation, are ripe for quantum disruption. Algorithms like the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) (Blekos et al., 2024) and variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) (Watanabe et al., 2024) are redefining how we solve large-scale optimization problems, even in this NISQ era.

For businesses, this is crucial. Whether it’s optimizing supply chains (Phillipson, 2024), resource allocation (Gauthier et al., 2024), or risk analysis (Stamatopoulos et al., 2024), quantum’s ability to process vast amounts of data in parallel could offer competitive advantages. The challenge, though, is that most organizations don’t yet have the infrastructure to deploy these solutions at scale. This is where understanding hybrid models—combining quantum and classical computing—becomes critical (Maio et al., 2024).

Exotic New Processing Units – Global Vendors Lead the Way

Quantum’s rapid progress isn’t happening in isolation. Across the globe, vendors from Japan, North America, and Europe are developing exotic new processing units that push the edges of computing paradigms. Whether it’s superconducting qubits from IBM, trapped ions from IonQ, or photonic processors from PsiQuantum, the diversity of approaches is a testament to the innovation happening in the quantum space.

Japan’s Hitachi, for example, is working on artificial annealing systems that are already being used for specific optimization tasks (Fukuhara et al., 2024). Meanwhile, companies like Xanadu in Canada are pioneering photonic quantum computing, which could solve some of the scalability issues plaguing other quantum systems (Madsen et al., 2022). These exotic processing units are designed to tackle very specific computational challenges—each with their own strengths and limitations.

For deep tech businesses, this diversity presents both opportunities and challenges. On one hand, you can pick a solution tailored to your specific needs; on the other hand, the sheer variety of approaches means there’s no clear “winning” technology yet. Staying ahead means keeping up with these innovations and being flexible enough to pivot as new breakthroughs emerge.

Navigating the Business Challenges in Quantum’s Early Era

For deep tech companies, investing in quantum computing isn’t just a technological decision—it’s a strategic one. Staying ahead of the curve means making long-term bets on a technology that hasn’t reached mass adoption. There’s a balancing act between preparing for the future and making sure today’s investments don’t sink resources without immediate payoff.

This is especially true when it comes to scaling. Quantum processors are still incredibly expensive to build and operate, meaning companies need to find ways to justify their investment through early wins (Golec et al., 2024). Whether it’s by developing hybrid quantum-classical models or finding niche applications where quantum excels today (like in optimization or cryptography), the key is to start small but think big.

In my role, I’ve seen companies succeed by focusing on proof-of-concept projects that leverage quantum’s strengths while remaining realistic about its current limitations. In upcoming posts, I’ll review quantum tools and platforms that allow businesses to begin experimenting with this technology today—without the need for massive infrastructure investments.

Conclusion: What’s Next for Quantum and Business?

Quantum computing is undeniably pushing the boundaries of what’s possible in mathematical optimization, operations research, and beyond. However, the road to full-scale adoption is still long, and businesses need to be strategic about how they approach it. In this blog, I’ll continue to provide technical reviews of the latest quantum technologies, while also discussing the broader business implications for companies navigating the early stages of this emerging field.

Stay tuned for my next post, where I’ll dive into the quantum tools available today and how businesses can begin experimenting with them to prepare for the quantum future.

References

Acharya, R., Aghababaie-Beni, L., Aleiner, I., Andersen, T. I., Ansmann, M., Arute, F., Arya, K., Asfaw, A., Astrakhantsev, N., Atalaya, J., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Ballard, B., Bardin, J. C., Bausch, J., Bengtsson, A., Bilmes, A., Blackwell, S., Boixo, S., … Zobrist, N. (2024). Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.13687

Blekos, K., Brand, D., Ceschini, A., Chou, C.-H., Li, R.-H., Pandya, K., & Summer, A. (2024). A review on Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and its variants. Physics Reports, 1068, 1–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2024.03.002

Bravyi, S., Cross, A. W., Gambetta, J. M., Magesan, E., Mezzacapo, A., & Temme, K. (2024). High-threshold and low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum memory. Nature, 627, 778–782. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07107-7

Cattelan, M., & Yarkoni, S. (2024). Modeling routing problems in QUBO with application to ride-hailing. Scientific Reports, 14, 19768. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70649-3

Dimitrov, E., Sanchez-Sanz, G., Nelson, J., O’Riordan, L., Doyle, M., Courtney, S., Kannan, V., Naseri, H., Garcia, A. G., Tricker, J., Faraggi, M., Goings, J., & Zhao, L. (2023). Pushing the Limits of Quantum Computing for Simulating PFAS Chemistry. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.01242

Fukuhara, R., Morishita, M., Katagiri, T., Kawai, M., Nagai, T., & Hoshino, T. (2024). Performance Evaluation of CMOS Annealing with Support Vector Machine. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15752

Gauthier, S., Vasantam, T., & Vardoyan, G. (2024). An on-demand resource allocation algorithm for a quantum network hub and its performance analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18066

Gill, S. S., Cetinkaya, O., Marrone, S., Claudino, D., Haunschild, D., Schlote, L., Wu, H., Ottaviani, C., Liu, X., Machupalli, S. P., Kaur, K., Arora, P., Liu, J., Farouk, A., Song, H. H., Uhlig, S., & Ramamohanarao, K. (2024). Quantum Computing: Vision and Challenges. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02240

Golec, M., Hatay, E. S., Golec, M., Uyar, M., Golec, M., & Gill, S. S. (2024). Quantum cloud computing: Trends and challenges. Journal of Economy and Technology, 2, 190–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ject.2024.05.001

Madsen, L. S., Laudenbach, F., Askarani, M. F., Rortais, F., Vincent, T., Bulmer, J. F. F., Miatto, F. M., Neuhaus, L., Helt, L. G., Collins, M. J., Lita, A. E., Gerrits, T., Nam, S. W., Vaidya, V. D., Menotti, M., Dhand, I., Vernon, Z., Quesada, N., & Lavoie, J. (2022). Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor. Nature, 606(7912), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04725-x

Maio, V. D., Kanatbekova, M., Zilk, F., Friis, N., Guggemos, T., & Brandic, I. (2024). Training Computer Scientists for the Challenges of Hybrid Quantum-Classical Computing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.00885

Phillipson, F. (2024). Quantum Computing in Logistics and Supply Chain Management an Overview. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.17520

Stamatopoulos, N., Clader, B. D., Woerner, S., & Zeng, W. J. (2024). Quantum Risk Analysis of Financial Derivatives. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10088

Watanabe, R., Fujii, K., & Ueda, H. (2024). Variational quantum eigensolver with embedded entanglement using a tensor-network ansatz. Phys. Rev. Res., 6(2), 023009. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.023009